We’re not here to discuss the intricacies of intelligence or what makes someone smart, so let’s just get that out of the way.
Yes, we know that things like I.Q. are controversial. And yes, we know that intelligence can be defined in many ways. Yes, our current methods of measuring intelligence need to change.
But let’s not kid ourselves. Some people are smarter than others. And, sometimes, we need to be able to tell if a person’s smart.
Maybe we’re a business owner and need to hire a sharp mind. Perhaps we’re looking for the best and brightest doctor to keep us healthy. Or maybe a brilliant tutor at https://www.slcedu.sg/o-level-english-tuition-singapore to help our child sharpen their skills.
We want to person we’re hiring to have a good head on their shoulders.
How can we find out who’s smart in a time-efficient manner?
A select group of folks from Quora chimed in – and the writer selected just one. Not only does the answer make the most logical sense, but it’s also valid from both a common-sense perspective and an empirical one.
For reference, the original question is: How can I identify the smartest person in the room?
One Timothy Emmanuel Lim wrote the answer that the writer chose to use. So, Mr. Lim, if you happen to come across this article, thank you for your incredible insights.
“Different smart people, different cues to look out for.”
To give Mr. Lim his full proper credit, and to account subsequent edits made, the response has been posted in its entirety. (Please see the edited portions in ‘3. It includes the element of humility.’)
‘Different smart people, different cues to look out for.
The smartest person (in no particular order) is most often;
- The hardest to verbally challenge (they may have opinions, but it’s purely derived from facts and logic).
- The quietest (they’re listening very closely and attentively — still water runs deep).
- The most observant (the little things that count are the big things to see — God is in the details).
- The fastest to question (and the hardest to answer).
- The most reserved, but not shy (because they’re constantly thinking, listening, and processing thoughts, rather than wasting time assuming and unfiltering their comments).
- The least reactive (because they know what to expect and not get surprised).
- The hardest to convince (while rebutting endlessly).
- The most open to question and being proved wrong (truth be above all things — including one’s ego).
- The most (logically) critical.
- The most bored-looking (not bored, just thinking about other things).
- The most unamused (mainly because things may get too predictable).
- The most direct (without being rude).
- The most secretly attentive (watch the eyes, it’s the greatest indicator).
- The most curious (not hyperactive).
- The most calm and controlled (rationality keeps the head calm).
- The most incomprehensible (some intellects are so superior, they’re too intelligent to be understood, given the right circumstances — thirties communication range).
- The most unorthodox (lateral thinking often proves intellectual superiority).
- The most receptive (open-minded).
- The most verbally intense.
- The one who looks the most dumb (circumstantial — never judge a book by its cover).
- The least impressed (they’re impressed by things not many people are impressed by, vice-versa).
- The least outwardly impressive (again, still water runs deep — they usually don’t care about other’s impressions of them).
Of course, these are some characteristics. The smartest person in the room doesn’t need to display all 22 because it can be subjective to character, personality, views, and upbringing.
The list is non-exhaustive. There are also exceptions here and there.
The smartest is not to be confused with the most knowledgeable. The two characteristics often go hand-in-hand but are independent of each other.
And smart people don’t often think of themselves as smart.
Why Lim is Right
Lim’s response makes sense for two reasons: (1) the humility with which it is written, and (2) the (probable) truth behind its assertions.
I wanted to check Mr. Lim’s credentials by reading some of his Quora posts. He does indeed craft his answers with what seems to be a piercing logic. He writes well and is extremely thorough in both his original postings and in his replies. Moreover, he cites references and is detail-oriented – two marks of a good writer. He’s most certainly of above-average intelligence, a.k.a., smart.
Most importantly, he is humble and openminded. These, too, as we will find out, are common characteristics of smart people.
I then got into the meat of Lim’s answer – and am in total agreement on just about every point. Here’s why:
It mirrors a subjective experience.
Now, the writer doesn’t often consider himself the “smartest person in the room.” With all humility, the writer supposes that he’s relatively bright. He has a pretty good education and has scored around the 95th percentile on a certified I.Q. test. He doesn’t say this to be a braggart, but merely to demonstrate that he may have a unique perspective on Lim’s observations.
Throughout his life, because of the accomplishments above, he has also had to privilege to hang around incredibly smart people. A few of whom he considers his friends.
And most of them fit what Lin says to a T. They’re smart without showing it; quiet, receptive, and respectful; reserved and non-reactive; curious and openminded; humble and unassuming.
Indeed, this writer’s own subjective experience with smart people is nearly dead-on with what Lim describes. While this isn’t empirical evidence, it’s quite strong – and it’s commonsensical.
The author describes introversion, which is related to high I.Q.
If you read through Mr. Lim’s list, you’ll notice that pretty much every line applies to the introvert.
Why is this important?
Because there exists a direct link between introversion and high intelligence. In a study undertaken by researchers at University of North Georgia (USA), researchers state in the introduction “It’s (noted) that introverts may exhibit higher I.Q. scores due to their calculated and analytical predisposition because they are more prone to think through things rather than being impulsive.”
Included in the analysis were 59 female undergraduate students; 41 tested as extroverts and 18 as introverts. The introverted group “had significantly better I.Q. scores” than their extroverted counterparts.